College Media Network

Tuition expected to rise again in 2009

Costs are expected to rise nationwide as colleges cut back, the College Board said.

Katie Kravit

Print this article

Published: Sunday, November 9, 2008

Updated: Monday, November 10, 2008

A new report issued by the College Board is signaling looming trouble for families that are just preparing to send their students to college.

This year, the cost of attending college rose 6 percent, according to the report. At USC, tuition and fees rose 5.35 percent, to $37,693, and total student costs rose by 5 percent from last year.

But the current economic crisis and the rising cost of education could push college costs even higher next year, said Elizabeth Garrett, USC vice president of academic planning and budget.

Students can expect higher tuition rates for next year, as well as higher costs for housing, food and textbooks. While USC does not directly control textbook or food prices, the growing rate of inflation and the faltering economy could result in substantially higher college costs, Garrett said. On average, a student attending a private university will graduate with $23,800 in debt, which is 18 percent higher than it was six years ago, according to College Board.

“I don’t think any of us want to raise tuition more than necessary. A lot of our increased costs are to improve the quality of education,” Garrett said.

But improving quality brings high costs, and many families have had a tough time keeping pace with the tuition increases, said Susan Ikerd, USC’s director of financial aid.

“We’ve already dealt with some families who couldn’t tap into their home equity to help with college assistance,” Ikerd said. “We’re probably going to see families who have less access to borrowing.”

Garrett said she didn’t expect rising tuition to impact the quality or number of applications to USC. Several factors, including inflation and the construction of major on-campus projects such as the Ronald Tutor Campus Center can impact tuition increases, she said. This year’s increase was slightly lower than the 5.7 percent tuition increase in 2007.

Some students said they were worried that given the economic downtown, a tuition increase would only make it more difficult for them to afford USC. Kyla Fenning, a sophomore majoring in cinema-television production, said the rising cost of tuition would make it difficult for her to afford USC and focus on her studies.

“I am already working a part-time job and interning in addition to my full course load. How am I supposed to afford USC now?” she said. “As an undergraduate student, I am told that my primary job is to be a student, to focus on my academics. But with the tuition hike that is impractical. Working, making ends meet, paying for housing and paying an obscene tuition now takes precedence.”

Negar Sarshar, an undeclared sophomore, said USC should be trying to alleviate the financial load for students, not burden them further.

“That’s scary in a time of economic crisis. If anything we should be looking to lower costs in such a time, not adding to financial struggle,” she said.

A bright spot in the College Board report was an increase in financial aid. Financial aid increased by a per-student average of 5.5 percent last year. At USC, about 28 percent of tuition goes toward financial aid, according to a letter USC officials submitted to the Senate Finance Committee earlier this year.

USC claims to have the largest financial aid pool of any private university in the country and meets 100 percent of university-determined financial need for undergraduates. More than 60 percent, or about 9,000 students, received some form of financial aid.

Comments

22 comments
Matt
Thu Jun 25 2009 04:04
The first two years of college are the same everywhere. Community college provides the same education at a fraction of the price. I went to a CC and then transferred, and I will end up with the same diploma as someone who went to the university all four years.
Ben Thayer
Fri Jun 5 2009 20:39
It's interesting to see how few students are able to write a sentence, punctuate it, and spell it correctly. Little wonder that they can't add well enough to see how they're being ripped -ff by this institution. But for most of them, it seems it's their parents who are blindly being ripped-off.
bob
Mon May 25 2009 19:42
well good for you, great aspirations and im glad ur so secure in your funds. of course you probably haven't earned and schlorships or anything and unless ur parents are hella rich itll be a huge fincial burden. for somebody that wants to be an accountant you really don't seem to know that much about money; I guess its not a huge promblem if your a little brat though.
Bridgette
Tue Apr 21 2009 21:39
i wanna go to ucs to become an accountant
it doesnt matter to me how much it costs cause my parents are gonna pay for it
all i wanna do is go to usc and graduate and be an accountant :)
Nicky
Tue Mar 17 2009 20:19
how much is the actual tuition fee for this year? 45,000?
nikki
Thu Mar 5 2009 17:16
gosh, usc is so expensive.
although sc offered me financial aid with acceptance, but it didn't cover enough to be worth it.
i think one year of usc is about all my 4 years at ucla combined.
i'm attending ucsf medical school.
a more expensive education is necessarily a better one.
heh, heh, public universities all the way for me i guess.
Krissy
Sat Jan 31 2009 21:49
How can I apply for a scholarship?
'SC Grad
Tue Dec 30 2008 19:01
To tell you the truth, I am sick and tired of hearing people complain about who is getting financial aid, and who isn't, and how much they received, and why some people didn't qualify. We have two children, attending a very academic prestigious elementary/middle school in Orange County, CA. The cost of their tuition exceeds the tuition my parents struggled to pay while I was a student at USC in the 1980's. It is very mind boggling, I know. However, please keep in mind that education is something that you can give your children and they will have it forever. It's not like a car, a house, a bike, whatever it be, it's a prestigious education.

I believe that people seek the education for their children and for themselves whether they can afford it or not. It is going to happen. It's happening to my family right now. We can't necessarily afford the $18,000/per child tuition for 2nd and 4th grade, but we're making it work. That's how important education is to us. We've compromised houses, cars, lifestyles, not being a stay at home mom anymore, in order to give this education to our children.

I only hope that someday, my children will look back and realize how hard parents must work in order to afford the education prices of today's standards. I do not agree with the people that say, "Well, if you can't afford it, you should go to the public schools." That kind of thinking is ignorant and wrong.

I do realized that tuition must be increased every year in order to meet the needs of the schools, however, more moderate increases, such as the cost of living increase, makes more sense to me, especially in light of the economy right now.

I do hope that my children can attend USC or any other University that they are accepted to. I have told them that I will let them go to any school they are accepted to and want to attend, but they HAVE to go to college.

Education is priceless and will remain that way. Go Trojans!!

Chris
Thu Nov 20 2008 18:58
community colleges offer equivalent lower division courses for less. $20 per unit at california community colleges. how much is it for "highly-vaunted PUBLIC universities" like UCLA?

oh yeah, most UCLA grads are products of community colleges. the difference between you and them are they have less loans to pay.

Michael
Sat Nov 15 2008 13:31
...and I thought tuition was high when I started at USC in1967: $1,800 a year! By the time I finished med school in 1975 it was about $4,500. Value? "Priceless" Remember that what counts is where you finish your education. If one must be cost effective, start at a community college and work hard at school as well as saving to transfer after two years.
Any USC Mom
Wed Nov 12 2008 13:41
Common sense, I think you missed my point. If you are unable to pay for the high tuition, you should get a loan (like we did) . The loans are set up to repay after you graduate. With a USC college degree, you should be able to repay your loan. What makes me angry are "lazy" people working the system to get something for free.
Jack
Tue Nov 11 2008 20:40
I didn't realize USC was in a financial crunch, but apparently the only way they can afford to sustain themselves and the only way professors can continue to drive Bentleys and BMWs is by making students pay more. Hm...
Common Sense
Tue Nov 11 2008 18:34
I think many are forgetting that this problem is not only present at USC, but at other colleges as well. The fact is, tuition will go up each year (unless its a community college) at most institutions. It has to go up with inflation.

The article mentions an 18% increase in loan debt over the last 6 years which is pretty close to what inflation was during that period. Inflation since Sept of 01 to Sept of 08 is close to 23%.

Some like Negar Sarshar may say that USC should perhaps cut tuition costs but do you think that any of the professors would like to take a pay cut? Any of its staff members? I'm positive that such a cut would somehow affect the student's education in one way or another.

To the bruin: USC is not the only school that takes in transfer students. I'm sure you have your fair share of transfer students.

To Any USC Mom: why do you get upset at a student who gets a "free ride" because of their financial situation? Do you get upset at every poor person you come across? I'm sure that if the opportunity arose to switch places with a family in his situation, you would much rather stay in your current situation. You might not be rich but I'm sure you maintain a certain lifestyle that may be above average. If you are paying your students full educational cost it must because you have a high income/large amount of assets.

Many families know the situation before they decide on what college to attend. It's no secret that USC is expensive, but yet you see students and families deciding to go to USC or any other expensive college knowing that they can not afford it. If you can not afford to attend to USC, attend another college. USC is not the only college out there. There are also other families who simply do not want to pay for their kids education because they are over the age of 18, paid their k-12 private school tuition and feel that they should no longer pay or have other non-financial issues at home (daughter decided not to major in what parents wanted, son is of different sexual orientation, daughter is dating someone that parents don't like, etc..). Students/familes have choices, if USC is too expensive go to a state school or community college. You can transfer after a couple of years if you so desire.

When I was a student, I recall a certain acquaintance of mine that was complaining and literally crying to the financial aid office about not getting enough financial aid, yet she went out and bought a new car and continued to maintain the same lifestyle she had in the past. Some are just unwilling to make those sacrifices needed and want others to meet those needs.

I put the blame on both the schools and their students. When you have colleges such as USC that are sought after by thousands of students, you leave the college no choice but the increase tuition and costs.

Joe
Tue Nov 11 2008 14:32
The problem with tuition is inherently a financial aid problem. Universities raise tuition, and financial aid (generally) goes up commensurately. Thus, universities are free to raise tuition more and more, as long as financial aid keeps pace. The numbers are artificially high as a result. It doesn't matter if tuition is $17,000 / semester or $170,000 / semester, as long as USC and the federal government meet students' financial 'need'.

Unfortunately, there are those students who get left out of the lovely vicious cycle - those whose parents either make just enough not to qualify for much financial aid but not enough to pay out of pocket, or those whose parents can pay the whole tuition bill out of pocket. Unlike poorer families, as tuition goes up their real cost goes up as well.

There are a few solutions. My personal favorite is the one where USC stops treating its students as its personal piggy bank, where it can get interest free loans for its pet projects (in spite of it having nearly $4 billion in its endowment) by raising tuition beyond reason. Another solution is to cap financial aid. If the government refuses to indulge universities which charge obscene tuition rates, the Harvards and USCs will have to slow their tuition increases. Or, they'll have to sacrifice their academic or diversity standards, because the pool of students that can afford the tuition without the now-customary federal subsidies will shrink. I somehow suspect USC would be unwilling to sacrifice its prestige by lowering its standards in order to charge higher tuition. Until then, the federal government is simply enabling universities in their poor decisions.

Bruin >>>> trojan
Mon Nov 10 2008 16:16
No Chris, smart people go to highly-vaunted PUBLIC universities such as UCLA or Cal straight out of high school instead of taking the easy, dumb-dumb route a la: easy community college, then use your inflated GPA to transfer to competitive, research universities. Community colleges unfortunately do not condition you to rigorous academics a la the U.C. system. As a undergrad alum from that SUPERIOR rival school across town, I went to community college for "brush-up" courses and it's a joke. No wonder the vast majority of SC undergrads are academically inferior relative to us Bruins.

USC cries that it's ranked unfairly relative to U.C. schools...well, maybe USC should immerse itself in more research? And maybe it should reduce the number of admits from community colleges w/ overinflated GPAs.

hahahahaha SUC = USC

Any USC Mom
Mon Nov 10 2008 16:07
I have a daughter attending USC. My husband and I are paying the bills because we want her to get the best education and focus 100% on her studies.We both work and far from being rich. I am very angry to hear of students getting a "full ride" when 1 parent works and the other stays at home. They qualify because of low income and the parent at home is not unable to work, but chooses not to. Shouldn't they make that parent work at the school to make up for that tution they're getting for free? Clean the classrooms or help maintain the university. Do something other than sit at home and brag that they don't have to pay a cent!!!
Alum No More
Mon Nov 10 2008 15:19
No doubt, next year, the Daily Trojan will still run 2-3 sob stories featuring students complaining about rents, which have been flat for years, but will never look at why USC tuition continues to climb (outreach, scholarships, "living wage" deals, "fair trade" deals, "improving" the school by admitting fewer students, and of course, a massive capital campaign.)
tommy trojan
Mon Nov 10 2008 11:52
I went to USC from 1999-2003 when tuition was in the high 20s to low 30s. USC met 100 percent of my financial need because my parents simply had no money and had no income. It was practically a full ride. Today I am a finance professional and a proud alum. Yes, it seems impossible to attend a private university like USC these days with their tuitions. At the same time, I also thought I had a slim to zero chance of going to a college like USC with my financial situation when I applied....but it worked out. I truly believe when they say they will meet 100 percent of university-determined financial need, they will do their best to meet that promise.
Chris
Mon Nov 10 2008 11:28
Smart people will go to a community college first, and THEN transfer to a university.
Trevor Bentley
Mon Nov 10 2008 10:08
When I graduated from USC, I was struggling to pay the $23,000.00+ can you guess the year?